How (and why) to stop multitasking

Harvard Business Review – How (and Why) to Stop Multitasking

A study showed that people distracted by incoming email and phone calls saw a 10-point fall in their IQs. What’s the impact of a 10-point drop? The same as losing a night of sleep. More than twice the effect of smoking marijuana.

Doing several things at once is a trick we play on ourselves, thinking we’re getting more done. In reality, our productivity goes down by as much as 40%. We don’t actually multitask. We switch-task, rapidly shifting from one thing to another, interrupting ourselves unproductively, and losing time in the process.

You might think you’re different, that you’ve done it so much you’ve become good at it. Practice makes perfect and all that.

But you’d be wrong. Research shows that heavy multitaskers are less competent at doing several things at once than light multitaskers. In other words, in contrast to almost everything else in your life, the more you multitask, the worse you are at it. Practice, in this case, works against you.

I decided to do an experiment. For one week I would do no multitasking and see what happened. What techniques would help? Could I sustain a focus on one thing at a time for that long?

Read More

The “life settlement” bond market

This is one of the odder reads I’ve had lately, though it makes perfect sense that a market would have sprung up in this space: It allows the elderly and otherwise gravely ill to get cash now and ease their last days on Earth, and an “investor” gets a substantial payoff somewhere down the road. The topic arose due to a discussion in my province of whether these types of transactions should be made legal here: Serious concerns about preying on the old and ill, whether or not life insurance in general would shoot up as a result of this new market.

Canadian Business – Insurance: Dead set against it?

Right now, somewhere in Toronto, someone is dying. He has congestive heart failure and diabetes. He has spent time in the hospital, and almost passed away last year. It seems he is not long for this world.

That’s sad, of course. But for someone else in Toronto, his death will mean a windfall because this man has a $350,000 life insurance policy. Or, at least, he had it. He sold the policy some time ago for a fraction of its value. Now the buyer of the policy is in need of some quick cash and is looking to sell it again. Don Jones, an insurance broker in Seattle, is trying to facilitate the sale — asking price: $175,000.

If he can swing a deal, Jones will collect a handsome finder’s fee. The seller will get a quick, six-figure payout. And whoever buys the policy will double their money, just as soon as the insured man passes away. It would seem to be a win-win transaction — if a pesky ethical quagmire, and some thorny legal questions, didn’t come along with it.

Life settlements, a booming, if somewhat misunderstood, multi-billion-dollar business in the U.S., are illegal in most Canadian provinces. All but four (Quebec, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia) have laws explicitly prohibiting trafficking in second-hand life insurance policies. And even in provinces where there are no laws expressly against life settlements, securities regulators are suspicious of them, which makes finding seed capital tricky.

Critics — with insurance companies being foremost among them — say such a market is ripe for exploiting the old, the frail and the desperate. Not only that, many warn a secondary market would drive up insurance premiums for everybody else, since current rates are based on the fact that some policies will default.

Proponents, however, point out that life settlements provide insurance policy owners with financial options they wouldn’t otherwise have. Although most insurance companies already provide people the option of buying the policy back, life settlement advocates claim that people often get 400% more cash for their policy through life settlements than they would get from their insurers.

It’s a three page article that I’ve cut down to the little shown above. Click through for a full viewing.

Note to self: Get one of these

Luxurious Art Deco 1964 Imperial LeBaron Coupe. This automobile represented the finest Chrysler had to offer in terms of style, luxury and comfort. The powertrain is an Overhead Valve 90 Degree V-8 engine producing 340 horsepower at 4600 rpm. The transmission is a torque flight fully automatic Pushbutton controlled. The exterior is a gorgeous Black, the interior is a white vinyl. Car shows normal signs of wear. Options include Pwr.Steering, Pwr.Brakes, Pwr. windows, Pwr. seats, Pwr.locks and factory A/C, currently not working. This car runs and drives well. Art on wheels! Taxes not included in the price. Gentry Lane Automobiles – 416-535-9900

1964 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron Coupe

Commodities (gold, oil) are a poor strategy for portfolio diversification

Interestingly, what’s written below doesn’t recommend never investing in commodities – but that one should do so for the right reasons (you have good intel on where the price is going, or you wish to invest in a specific commodity producer).

Financial Post – Another culprit in the big hurt: Commodities hardly a strategy for diversification

It was an idea inspired by Ivy League research. The research said that enhancing your portfolio with a splash of commodities — things such as gold, oil and pork bellies — could allow you to reap stock-like profits while providing a safe harbour during market downturns.

It sounded lovely in theory. But commodity investing flopped in practice. Despite a mild recovery, broad commodity indexes are still below their levels of 2008. Rather than being a counterbalance to equities, commodities have bounced up and down in tandem with Wall Street.

To understand how important the fine print is, go back to 2006, when two Yale professors published one of the most influential finance papers in years.

Gary Gorton and Geert Rouwenhorst examined 45 years of market history and concluded that investing in commodity futures, while using U.S. treasury bills as collateral, produced returns just as good as putting money into stocks. Even more enticing was their conclusion that commodities tended to do well when stocks did badly.

To institutional investors, this was catnip. Putting money into commodity futures –contracts for the delivery of commodities in months to come — looked like the perfect way to balance the risks in the stock market.

Within months of the paper’s publication, money managers were searching for easy ways to invest in commodity futures. Fund companies obliged them by creating specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

The new ETFs got off to a roaring start as money poured into what appeared to be a sure bet. Then the stock market sank in mid-2008. This was when the Yale professors had predicted that commodities should shine.

Commodities did no such thing. They plunged in line with the stock market, then struggled to recover only part of their losses. So much for big gains and reducing risk. What went wrong? One theory blames the global recession. Another theory is that the flood of money into commodities changed the nature of the market.

Read More

myforumalerts.com

[image]https://yllus.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/myforumalerts.jpg[/image]
[link]http://myforumalerts.com/[/link]
[description]A free service built on PHP / AJAX / MySQL / Apache that allows its users to monitor popular Web forums for the appearance of keywords. An e-mail alert is then dispatched to the user to notify them regarding the match. Primarily used for buy/sell/trade items and marketing research.[/description]

Seven useful Canadian income tax deductions

The 2009 tax season is ending in just another two days, and whether you’ve already filed with CRA or not, here are some interesting and overlooked deductions and credits you might still have time to take advantage of.

MoneySense – Seven tax tips you need to know right now

Deductions

Interest on income producing assets
If you’ve borrowed money to invest or own a rental property, you can claim the interest. It’s something that may be easy to forget, since you can’t claim interest payments on credit cards or your non-income producing property. But if you’re paying the bank every month for an investment loan, you can get a deduction. “You won’t get a slip,” says Courcelles, so make sure you ask the bank for a receipt.

Safety deposit box deductions
This might come as surprise, but you can deduct your safety deposit box expenses. It’s true! Just get a receipt from your financial institution.

Union or professional dues
Those pesky union or professional dues getting to you? You’ll be happy to know they can be deducted too. This only works if your employer is not paying for them, but for many lawyers, chartered accountants and other Canadians with a professional designation, these costs come out of pocket.

Moving expenses
Good for students and workers. If you moved more than 40 km for a new job or school you can deduct those expenses. Everything from renting a U-Haul to hotel and meals are covered.

Credits

First Time Home Buyers Credit
Buying a home is stressful and costly, so you may not have been thinking much about tax time when you purchased your new abode. Now that you’re crunching the numbers though, make sure you claim the First Time Home Buyers Credit. As the name suggests, this only applies to Canadians who are buying their first place, and you had to purchase the home after January 28, 2009. You’ll get $750 back with the credit and “you can make as much or as little as you want, as long as you bought a house,” says Courcelles.

Medical expenses
Many Canadians have the misconception that all our healthcare related needs are covered. Not so. We still pay for medicine (if an employer doesn’t cover the full amount), some or all dental costs, extra doctor fees, orthodontists, chiropractors and the list goes on. If your bills exceed 3% if your net income, or $2,011 — whichever is less — you can claim those expenses.

Courcelles says it’s best to pool these expenses onto the lower income spouse’s return, so that 3% will be exceeded quicker than if it was on the higher earner’s return. It’s important to note that you can only claim what you pay yourself. If an employer covers 80% of medical expenses, you can only claim the other 20%.

Eligible dependent credit
This one applies, in most cases, to single parents. If you’re raising family without a partner — whether you’ve been divorced, widowed or are a single parent — you can get this credit. The eligible dependent amount is $10,320 minus the dependent’s income. “If you have a 5-year-old child who has no income you multiply the $10,320 by 15% and that’s your credit,” says Courcelles. This also works for child support payments, and you can claim the credit if your spouse makes less than the eligible dependent amount.

Amusing/alarming fact of the day

Does the mighty Fed really control the information flow and ultimately the press? Prof. Larry White subjected this question to what the Fed must have thought was the indignity of factual verification. His findings support Friedman’s assertion. In 2002, 74% of the articles on monetary policy published by U.S. economists in U.S.-edited journals appeared in journals published by the Fed, or were authored (or co-authored) by Fed staff economists.

Rewriting the Fed’s history, National Post, January 21, 2010

My entry in the Rename Sherbourne Park contest

Here’s my submission to the Rename Sherbourne Park contest being held by Waterfront Toronto and Torontoist:

Halcyon Days Park

The origin of ‘halcyon’ goes back to Greek mythology – the halcyon is a mythical bird that had the ability to calm the seas in order to safely hatch her eggs on its floating nest. To sailors, halcyon days are the two weeks of calm weather in the wintertime. More recently, the phrase ‘halcyon days’ is used to inspire nostalgia about the endless sunny days in one’s youth.

Seems the perfect name to me. In the latter half century, Sherbourne St. has had more than its fair share of troubles (not to mention the pre-park conditions of the area being built upon). This park at the foot of the street will hopefully serve as an anchor and bring tranquility to what I find to be a lovely neighbourhood and area.

Some interesting backstory to ‘halcyon days’ can be read here. A plaque with the relevant segment from Ovid’s poetry would be a great finishing touch on the park.

Last bit: I like the name “Halcyon Days Park”, but “Halcyon Park” is quite nice as well. You decide!

If this gets to the semi-finalist round, expect a large amount of spam from me to get out the vote.

Auto Playlist Updater

[image]https://yllus.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/auto_playlist_updater.jpg[/image]
[link]https://github.com/yllus/Auto-Playlist-Updater[/link]
[description]Auto Playlist Updater is a simple Python application whose purpose is to scan a directory for MP3 files and create a M3U playlist out of that list of files. The application then rescans the directory on a regular basis and updates the playlist with the new items found.

This application was designed specifically for the D-Link DNS-323 NAS.[/description]

It makes sense to buy your first home at the age of 50, after renting for 25 years

The following is an excerpt from Prof. Moshe Milevsky’s Your Money Milestones: A Guide to Making the 9 Most Important Financial Decisions of Your Life. It argues that the logic of ‘investing’ in real estate early in your life is a much less logical decision than waiting as long as possible to sink your capital into a relatively illiquid asset.

The Globe And Mail – Many homeowners should have rented

At first glance, when you buy a house for, say, $500,000, you are increasing the left side of your personal balance sheet (your assets) by $500,000 dollars. If you used $50,000 as a downpayment, which came from your own assets, the increase in assets was only $450,000.

On the right side of the personal balance sheet, you had to finance the purchase of this house with debt, so if you made a 10 per cent down payment and financed the other $450,000, your liabilities have increased by $450,000 in total. The important thing to remember is that the equity on your personal balance sheet has not changed. You have $450,000 more in assets and $450,000 more in liabilities–and you’ve converted financial capital into a down payment.

Now let’s examine what your personal balance sheet will look like in five years, ignoring human capital considerations. If you have been carefully paying down your mortgage debt, perhaps the remaining liabilities have been reduced to $400,000. And, even if housing prices have not increased at all, you have created $50,000 more in equity in your home, for total equity of $100,000. (This is the original downpayment of $50,000 plus the $50,000 in total payments over the last five years.) So far, so good.

But now let’s imagine that housing prices fell by 20 per cent over that same five-year period. This isn’t inconceivable–and is exactly what just happened in many regions of the United States over the last five years, as shown in Table 6.1. In that case, a 20 per cent drop in the value of a $500,000 house leaves you with a balance sheet asset of $400,000. This is exactly what you owe in debt (mortgage) on the house, and you have no equity. The $50,000 you originally invested in the house is gone, and all the payments you have made in the last five years could essentially be considered rent.

You are no further ahead now, financially, than you were five years ago. All you did was consume housing.

Read More